HHHEEELLLLLL....


Paul was the Apostle to the Gentiles...He received the the Gospel of Grace from Jesus Himself and the revelation of its mystery for the Church. He was not ashamed of the Gospel of Christ because He declared the "whole council of God. Yet nowhere in his writings did he teach or preach on hell!

Wait a cotton-picken minute..."Paul you never preached on, taught on or even alluded to the great drawing card to get people saved...the great doctrine of HELL in any of your Epistles". Yet you have the audacity to declare that you have declared the "WHOLE COUNCIL OF GOD...come on man get real."

That can't be...can it? How could Paul's ministry have brought glory to God, while he did not mention the word hell once? I mean the traditional doctrine of hell is at the very foundation of religious creeds. How could Paul have been so negligent in failing through his entire ministry to teach on the great doctrine of hell the cornerstone of religion? 

Is it possible Paul understood the Gospel of Christ and we don’t? Could it be that hell is NOT a part of the "whole council of God?

Look at what He says in Acts: “Wherefore I take you to record this day, that I am pure from the blood of all men. For I have not shunned to declare unto you all the counsel of God” (Acts 20:26,27). Yet the religionists say that if we don't preach "hell fire" we will not be free of the blood of all men...Poor delusional Paul!

The plain and simple fact is that Paul was NOT negligent in his teaching ministry. Here is a passage that makes this clear. Paul said that he was “pure from the blood of all men,” because he had declared “the whole counsel of God”...the whole of which DID NOT include a hell fire torture chamber.
Could Paul have never used the word hell and yet declare “all the counsel of God”? Could he have been “pure from the blood of all men” without even once using the word hell? Could it be that hell is NOT a part of the whole council of God? 

Have the Community of the Redeemed been duped into accepting a religious tradition that is contrary to the sound Scriptural teachings of the Apostle to the Gentiles?

If we believe the Gospel Jesus gave Paul...which means that Jesus did not give him a hell fire doctrine...would we not also exclude hell from our teaching?

The religious hell teachings concerning hell is not sound doctrine or a part of the Grace message of Christ.

We need not be afraid of where this truth takes us. Truth truly sets us free from religious bondage. And the fear of the religious hierarchy. Jesus said: “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free” (John 8:32).

Should we not follow Paul and Christ's Gospel of Grace in which there is no place for, nor need of a religious hell fire torture chamber.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DO NOT FORSAKE THE ASSEMBLING OF YOURSELVES TOGETHER! by David Yeubanks

“Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together" (Hebrews 10:25), is a common verse cited by Christians who believe that if you're not attending weekly meetings or plugged in a church denomination that you are somehow out of sync with Scripture and, for all practical purposes, "backsliding". Some refer to the out of church crowd as rebels, or the walking wounded and this verse is often given as the prescription. But is "attending church" really what the author of Hebrews had in mind here? YES THE BIBLE SAY’S NOT TO FORSAKE THE ASSEMBLING TOGETHER? NOTICE IT DOES NOT SAY DO NOT FORSAKE THE "ASSEMBLY" OR CHURCH BUILDING. First of all, it is essential that we understand the meaning of the word "church" as it is used in the Bible. These comments, while being historically and biblically sound, are not meant to suggest that Christians should not meet together, share fellowship, pray or preach the Word of God. If that is the conclusion
Read more

A Bloggers Take on "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" and "Hell".

Image
HAPPY DADS AND THE HORRORS OF HELL by Jeff Turner Jonathan Edwards once said the following words: “Reprobate infants are vipers of vengeance, which Jehovah will hold over hell, in the tongs of his wrath, till they turn and spit venom in his face!” Elsewhere, Edwards asked the question: “Can the believing father in Heaven be happy with his unbelieving children in Hell?” Now, a bit of clarification: Edwards is not referring to God when he speaks of the “believing father in Heaven”. Rather, he is speaking an earthly father who enters Heaven, while His children are sentenced to an eternity in Hell. One would assume that Edwards’ answer to this question would be something akin to, “Nay! And a thousand times nay!”. Unfortunately, his answer was as follows: “…it [the sight of his children in Hell] will increase rather than diminish his bliss.” To be honest with you, I’m not sure if I’ve ever read more demonic, and putrid words in all of my life. I have a level of respec
Read more

The Abusive Tool of Fear-Mongering.

Image
  Fear mongering is an abusive tool used by religion which cripples and limits one's spiritual growth to mature to the full stature of Christ. The fear mongering propaganda that is used as a means to get people saved speaks volumes about the quality of love used to try and scare people to become Christ followers. The scriptures declare that is is the “goodness of God that leads to repentance.” Another characteristic of  fear mongering believers is that they believe that natural disasters are God’s doing and are warnings or punishment for the sin of sinning people. Their sin consciousnesses has blurred their God consciousnesses to where they see God as the big bad wolf waiting to pounce on somebody for sinning. Natural disasters have happened at different times throughout history. Theses events have been used by money hungry fear-mongers to write books of impending doom, passed of as the gospel by using out-of-context scripture verses to validate the acceptance and sale of t
Read more