Why were the Pharisees (Religious people) opposed to Jesus?
The
religionists during the earth walk of Jesus were the Pharisees. Wanting
to uphold all of God’s laws, they devised an intricate system of oral
tradition to keep them from breaking the Mosaic law. But their reason
for wanting to keep the Law was because they were afraid of the
consequences of breaking it and would suffer the wrath of a angry God.
If it wasn't for their self-righteousness they may have recognized the
perfect obedience of Jesus and accepted the finished work of the cross
and affirmed and followed Him. But, as demonstrated by the events
recorded in Matthew 12:1–37, they were His most bitter opponents. Why was this?
The
essential problem lay in their different understanding of the nature of
God. For the religious Pharisees, as well as the religious people of
today, God is primarily a God who makes rules to be obeyed. For the
religious law and rule keepers of today, the bible is primarily a set of
rules that must be kept at all costs. For Jesus, as well
believers in His Gospel of Grace, God is primarily “gracious and
merciful, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love” (Ps. 145:8).
The
ultimate cause of the Pharisees’ antagonism toward Jesus lay in His
ignoring of their hundreds of elaborate rules that they had
devised for interpreting the law of God. Not only did they devise these
hundreds of man-made rules, but they had also elevated them above the
level of Law, so that to break one of their rules was to violate the law
of God itself. And yet these rules not only obscured the true intent of
God’s law, but also, in some cases, actually violated it (see Mark 7:9–13).
One
of these violations that Pharisees upset with Jesus was the way He
ignored their trivial and burdensome rule keeping. In Matthew 12 verses
1–8, the Pharisees objected to the disciples of Jesus plucking and
eating heads of grain as they walked through the grain fields on a
Sabbath. According to their oral tradition, plucking the heads of grain
and eating them was work and was a violation of the Sabbath.
On
that same Sabbath day, Jesus entered their synagogue where there was a
man with a withered hand. Now, eager to again accuse Jesus of failing to
uphold the Mosaic Law, they asked him, “Is it lawful to heal on the
Sabbath?”. Before healing the man, Jesus answers their question by
asking which of them, if his sheep falls into a pit on the Sabbath,
would not lift it out. If, then, it is lawful to relieve the misery of a
sheep on the Sabbath, how much more is it lawful to relieve the misery
of a fellow human being who is more valuable than a sheep?
In
both instances...that of the disciples eating the grain and of Jesus
healing the man’s withered hand...the scriptural principle that Jesus
applies is that God "desires mercy and not sacrifice”.
Jesus
also heals a demon-oppressed man who was blind and mute. Not having a
Sabbath violation charge to bring against Jesus, the Pharisees now
resorted to the slanderous charge that Jesus cast out demons by
Beelzebub, the prince of demons (that is, Satan himself). Since Jesus
cast out demons by the power of the Holy Spirit (v. 28), their
slanderous charge was actually blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.
People
of God, we need to be careful that we do not add our own man-made
interpretations or rules to the Scriptures. Some beliefs that we hold
dearly may be derived more from our religious culture or denominated
denominations more than derived from Scripture, and we need to learn to
discern the differences. Religious judgementalism and condemnation among
religionists today is a result of the injection of man-made ideologies
that are accepted as doctrines of Christ. But that is basically what the
Pharisees were doing and what religion is continuing to do today.
Comments
Post a Comment